back to top
Google search engine
HomeMen's Open BodybuildingDerek LunsfordAngel Calderon Frias vs Derek Lunsford: Prime Comparison

Angel Calderon Frias vs Derek Lunsford: Prime Comparison


Performance-only peak comparison

Compare two bodybuilders at their peak using Olympia-win prime windows and era-normalized scoring. No cultural-impact bonus is used here.

Angel Calderon Frias prime vs Derek Lunsford prime


Different divisions – era comparison only.
Angel Calderon Frias scores 4.2 for 2014.
Derek Lunsford scores 24.0 for 2023-2025.



Different divisions – era comparison only
Cultural impact excluded

Angel Calderon Frias

Prime window
2014

Prime score
4.2

Olympia wins
0

Prime win rate
50.0%

OFSI avg
0.000

Prime field avg
0.0

Men’s 212 Bodybuilding – division launch: 2008


Derek Lunsford

Prime window
2023-2025

Prime score
24.0

Olympia wins
2

Prime win rate
80.0%

OFSI avg
0.630

Prime field avg
18.0

Men’s Open Bodybuilding – division launch: 1965



Score bars

Performance-only prime score

Prime score = Prime EAODS + prime competition score + prime consistency bonus. Cultural impact and historical bonuses are excluded.

  • Angel Calderon Frias: EAODS 0.0, competition 4.2, consistency 0.0.
  • Derek Lunsford: EAODS 13.0, competition 8.0, consistency 3.0.
  • Prime window = Olympia-win years only. Scores are performance-only: no cultural or historical component.


Limitations

What this comparison does not claim

OFSI is a field-size proxy. It does not measure the quality of each opponent, judging criteria, training technology, or public influence. The page is a deterministic comparison over database results, not a verdict generator.

  • Cross-division matchups are allowed and labeled as era comparison only.
  • Athletes with no Olympia title use a career-best three-year window and are labeled as such.
  • Classic Physique uses Classic-specific Olympia fields, with 2016 shown as the division launch year.


Methodology

How the prime score is built

The prime score is a performance-only total. It reuses the era-adjusted board’s components for an athlete’s Olympia-win prime window, with cultural and historical components deliberately removed so the comparison stays on the field of play.

  • Era-Adjusted Olympia Dominance: max 40.
  • Competition Record: max 20.
  • Consistency Bonus: max 10.
  • Cultural impact and historical components are excluded from the prime score.
  • Prime window = Olympia-win years only. Scores are performance-only: no cultural or historical component.




Methodology-based
Figures are query-derived; the prime score follows a fixed, published weighting of era-adjusted Olympia dominance, competition record, and consistency over each athlete’s Olympia-win prime window.




Source link

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments