back to top
Google search engine
HomeIFBB ProMen's Open BodybuildingJuan Morel vs Phil Heath: Prime Comparison

Juan Morel vs Phil Heath: Prime Comparison


Performance-only peak comparison

Compare two bodybuilders at their peak using Olympia-win prime windows and era-normalized scoring. No cultural-impact bonus is used here.

Juan Morel prime vs Phil Heath prime


Same division comparison.
Juan Morel scores 4.3 for 2008-2009.
Phil Heath scores 58.5 for 2011-2017.



Same division comparison
Cultural impact excluded


Prime window
2008-2009

Prime score
4.3

Olympia wins
0

Prime win rate
33.3%

OFSI avg
0.000

Prime field avg
0.0

Men’s Open Bodybuilding – division launch: 1965


Phil Heath

Prime window
2011-2017

Prime score
58.5

Olympia wins
7

Prime win rate
100.0%

OFSI avg
0.709

Prime field avg
20.1

Men’s Open Bodybuilding – division launch: 1965



Score bars

Performance-only prime score

Prime score = Prime EAODS + prime competition score + prime consistency bonus. Cultural impact and historical bonuses are excluded.

  • Juan Morel: EAODS 0.0, competition 2.8, consistency 1.5.
  • Phil Heath: EAODS 40.0, competition 9.5, consistency 9.0.
  • Prime window = Olympia-win years only. Scores are performance-only: no cultural or historical component.


Limitations

What this comparison does not claim

OFSI is a field-size proxy. It does not measure the quality of each opponent, judging criteria, training technology, or public influence. The page is a deterministic comparison over database results, not a verdict generator.

  • Cross-division matchups are allowed and labeled as era comparison only.
  • Athletes with no Olympia title use a career-best three-year window and are labeled as such.
  • Classic Physique uses Classic-specific Olympia fields, with 2016 shown as the division launch year.


Methodology

How the prime score is built

The prime score is a performance-only total. It reuses the era-adjusted board’s components for an athlete’s Olympia-win prime window, with cultural and historical components deliberately removed so the comparison stays on the field of play.

  • Era-Adjusted Olympia Dominance: max 40.
  • Competition Record: max 20.
  • Consistency Bonus: max 10.
  • Cultural impact and historical components are excluded from the prime score.
  • Prime window = Olympia-win years only. Scores are performance-only: no cultural or historical component.




Methodology-based
Figures are query-derived; the prime score follows a fixed, published weighting of era-adjusted Olympia dominance, competition record, and consistency over each athlete’s Olympia-win prime window.




Source link

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments